Delegation of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus to the CSTO PA consists of 7 deputies from the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus and 4 deputies from the Council of the Republic of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus.
Plenipotentiary representative of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus: Viktor Kogut
Website of the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus: http://house.gov.by/en/
Website of the Council of the Republic of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus: http://www.sovrep.gov.by/ru/
Delegation of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan to the CSTO PA consists of 8 deputies from the Mazhilis of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan and 8 members of the Senate of the Parliament of Kazakhstan.
Plenipotentiary Representative of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan, deputy Executive Secretary of the CSTO Parliamentary Assembly: Viktor Rogalev
Delegation of the Supreme Council of the Kyrgyz Republic to the CSTO PA consists of 7 deputies.
Plenipotentiary Representative of the Supreme Council of the Kyrgyz Republic: Shabdanbek Alishev
Website of the Supreme Council of the Kyrgyz Republic: http://www.kenesh.kg/
Delegation of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation to the CSTO PA consists of 10 deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation and 12 members of the Federation Council of the Russian Federation.
Plenipotentiary representative of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation - deputy Executive Secretary of the CSTO Parliamentary Assembly: Mikhail Krotov
Delegation of the Supreme Assembly of the Republic of Tajikistan to the CSTO PA consists of 6 deputies of the National Assembly of the Supreme Assembly of the Republic of Tajikistan and 6 deputies of the Assembly of Representatives of the Supreme Assembly of the Republic of Tajikistan.
CSTO PA’s model lawmaking constantly addresses anti-corruption
10 December 2020
CSTO PA’s model lawmaking constantly addresses anti-corruption
December 9 is the International Anti-Corruption Day. Several times since the Parliamentary Assembly of the Collective Security Treaty Organization began its work, the Organization has returned to the issues of improving model legislation in the area of anti-corruption, creating a strict consistent system of model legislation to combat this phenomenon.
According to the document substantiating the need to develop recommendations to counter corruption, “Despite the measures taken by the CSTO Member States to counter corruption, this phenomenon still significantly hinders social transformation and economic modernization, causes people’s distrust to state institutions, negatively affects their image in the international arena and is objectively considered as one of the main threats to national security.”
The document’s development began with a comprehensive comparative legal analysis of the CSTO Member States’ legislation in the area of prevention and fight against corruption.
Then the document was drafted with the main emphasis on the legal regulation of the system of anti-corruption measures (including measures to prevent corruption offenses; their suppression; liability for their commission; compensation for damage caused by corruption offenses), as well as the harmonization of legal regulation of the formation of anti-corruption standards, which include a set of guarantees, restrictions and prohibitions in various spheres of life of the state and society.
On November 26, 2015, after discussions in the CSTO Member States’ parliaments, the CSTO Parliamentary Assembly adopted the Recommendations, but the development of model legislation in the area of combating corruption in the CSTO States continued.
Although the anti-corruption work continues, it should be noted that the model legislation adopted by the CSTO PA forms a fairly coherent system that helps to approximate and improve the national legislation of the CSTO Member States in the fight against corruption, removing its enablers and minimizing the consequences of corruption practices.